et ils allèrent trouver les principaux sacrificateurs et les anciens, auxquels ils dirent: Nous nous sommes engagés, avec des imprécations contre nous-mêmes, à ne rien manger jusqu'à ce que nous ayons tué Paul.
Que signifie ce verset ?
In this verse from the book of Acts, a group of people tell the chief priests and elders that they have promised to not eat until they kill Paul. This shows their determination and seriousness in wanting to harm him.
Expliqué aux enfants
Imagine you made a promise with your friends to skip dinner until you do something important. In this case, some bad guys are making a similar but very serious promise about hurting Paul.
Contexte historique
This verse is part of the Book of Acts written by Luke around AD 60-80. It describes events in Jerusalem where tensions ran high between Jewish leaders and early Christians like Paul. The cultural setting was one of intense religious conflict and legal struggles over new Christian beliefs.
Application pour aujourd'hui
Today, we can relate this to situations where people become overly determined to hurt someone they dislike. Instead of making such vows, it's important to resolve conflicts through dialogue and understanding.
Thèmes
conflict resolutionoaths and vowsearly ChristianityPaul's ministryJewish-Christian relationsdetermination
The group felt so strongly against Paul and his teachings that they vowed not to eat until he was killed, showing their extreme commitment to this action.
Is making oaths like this common in the Bible?
Yes, while oaths are mentioned throughout the Bible, Jesus warned against excessive use of them (Matthew 5:34-37), advocating for truthfulness without relying on formal vows.
How did Paul respond to these threats?
Paul continued his ministry despite the threats. He often used such situations as opportunities to preach and sometimes appealed to Roman law or protection, as seen in other parts of Acts.
What can we learn from this about dealing with conflicts?
This verse teaches us to avoid making rash promises that could lead to harmful actions. Instead, resolving differences through peace and understanding is a more positive approach.