그리하여 이스라엘 왕이 예언자 사백 명을 불러 모아놓고 물었다. “우리가 길르앗 의 라못 을 치러 가는 것이 좋겠소, 아니면 그만 두는 것이 좋겠소?” 예언자들이 대답하였다. “가십시오. 하나님께서 그 땅을 임금님의 손에 넘겨주실 것입니다.”
이 구절의 의미
In this verse, the king of Israel asks a group of 400 prophets if they should go to battle at Ramothgilead. The prophets tell him to go, saying God will help him win. This shows how leaders sometimes seek advice from religious figures before making big decisions.
어린이를 위한 설명
Imagine the king of a country is like a captain of a big team, and he asks 400 of his friends for advice on whether to play a big game. His friends tell him to play because they think his team will win. It's like asking your friends if you should play a game and they tell you it's a good idea.
역사적 배경
2 Chronicles was written after the exile in Babylon, around 538-323 BCE. The audience was the returning exiles and future generations. The cultural setting was one of rebuilding and re-establishing faith in God after a period of hardship and loss.
오늘의 적용
In modern times, this can apply to a CEO seeking advice from a team of consultants before making a big business decision. Just like the king, the CEO might look for guidance and assurance that the decision will lead to success.
The 400 prophets were religious figures who the king of Israel believed could provide divine guidance. They likely belonged to the religious establishment that supported the king's rule.
What was Ramothgilead?
Ramothgilead was a city located in the region of Gilead, east of the Jordan River. It was a strategic location and was often the site of battles between different kingdoms.
Why did the king consult the prophets?
The king sought the prophets' advice because he believed they could provide divine guidance. In ancient times, religious figures were often consulted for important decisions, especially those involving war.
What can we learn from the prophets' response?
The prophets' response highlights the importance of seeking honest advice, even if it means hearing something we don't want to hear. It also shows the potential danger of relying solely on supportive voices, as this can lead to poor decision-making.