Numbers 35:30

Vietnamese Contemporary 2015 (Kinh Thánh Hiện Đại)

Kẻ sát nhân phải bị xử tử, nhưng phải có ít nhất hai nhân chứng. Một nhân chứng không đủ để kết án tử hình.

Điều này có nghĩa gì?

This verse from the Book of Numbers says that if someone kills another person, the murderer must be put to death, but only if there are two or more witnesses to the act. It emphasizes the importance of having multiple witnesses before condemning someone to death.

Giải thích cho trẻ em

Imagine if you were playing a game and someone said you cheated, but only one person saw it happen. This verse says that wouldn't be enough to say you cheated; at least two people need to see it to be sure.

Bối cảnh lịch sử

The Book of Numbers was written by Moses around 1400 BC, recording laws and events for the Israelites. This particular verse establishes a judicial principle that required multiple witnesses to convict someone of murder.

Áp dụng cho hôm nay

In today's legal systems, this principle of requiring multiple witnesses is still important. For instance, in a court case, if only one person testifies that someone committed a crime, it’s often not enough to secure a conviction.

Chủ đề

• justice
• witnesses
• murder
• judicial laws
• Biblical justice
• legal standards

Các câu liên quan

• Deuteronomy 17:6
• Deuteronomy 19:15
• Matthew 18:16
• 1 Timothy 5:19
• Hebrews 10:28

Sách nên đọc

Chú giải Chú giải Numbers → Mua Kinh Thánh này Kinh Thánh nghiên cứu Contemporary (Kinh Thánh Hiện Đại) →

Câu hỏi thường gặp

Why does this verse require multiple witnesses?

Multiple witnesses ensure the reliability of the testimony and prevent wrongful convictions, emphasizing fairness and justice in judicial proceedings.

Does this apply to all crimes or just murder?

The verse specifically addresses murder, but the principle of requiring multiple witnesses for conviction is often extended to other serious crimes in various legal systems.

How did ancient Israelites apply this law?

Ancient Israelites applied this law strictly in their courts, ensuring that no one was wrongfully convicted of murder without sufficient evidence from multiple witnesses.

Is this principle still relevant today?

Yes, the principle of requiring multiple witnesses or substantial evidence is still relevant and often applied in modern legal systems to ensure fair trials.