Ezra 4:15

Vietnamese (Kinh Thánh Tiếng Việt 1925)

đặng người ta tra khảo trong sử ký các tổ phụ của vua: tất sẽ tìm thấy trong sách sử ký đó và biết rằng cái thành nầy vốn một cái thành phản nghịch, gây thiệt hại cho các vua và nước; từ thuở xưa, người ta hay làm loạn ở đó; bởi cớ ấy thành nầy đã bị phá hoang.

Điều này có nghĩa gì?

This verse is part of a letter from people against rebuilding Jerusalem to King Artaxerxes. They suggest checking old records to show that Jerusalem has a history of rebellion and troublemaking, which is why it was destroyed before.

Giải thích cho trẻ em

Imagine you're playing with your friends and one of them says, 'Hey, let's check the rule book to see why the other kids used to get in trouble for playing here.' That's kind of what this verse is saying, but about a big city and kings instead of a playground.

Bối cảnh lịch sử

Ezra, a priest and scribe, wrote this book after the Babylonian exile. It was written around 450-440 BC and is aimed at the returning exiles who were facing opposition in rebuilding Jerusalem. The cultural setting was one of political intrigue and resistance from local populations.

Áp dụng cho hôm nay

In today's context, this verse can be seen as a caution against repeating historical mistakes. For example, if a business repeatedly faces legal troubles, it might be wise to review their history to understand and address the underlying issues.

Chủ đề

• rebellion
• history
• opposition
• rebuilding
• conflict
• records

Các câu liên quan

• 1 Kings 11:26-28
• 2 Kings 25:1-12
• Nehemiah 4:1-3
• Jeremiah 26:1-19
• Acts 23:27-30

Câu hỏi thường gặp

Why was Jerusalem considered rebellious?

Jerusalem had a history of resistance against various empires, leading to its destruction and the exile of its inhabitants.

What does this verse teach about records?

It emphasizes the importance of historical records in understanding the past and learning from it.

How does this relate to rebuilding?

It highlights the challenges faced by those rebuilding Jerusalem, facing opposition based on historical grievances.

What can we learn from this about conflict?

It shows that understanding the roots of conflict and addressing them can be crucial in resolving disputes.