Ezra 4:19

Vietnamese (Kinh Thánh Tiếng Việt 1925)

Cứ theo mạng lịnh ta, người ta đã tra khảo, thấy rằng từ đời xưa cái thành nầy có dấy loạn với các vua, và trong đó hằng có sự phản nghịch và việc ngụy đảng.

Điều này có nghĩa gì?

The verse describes a king's response to a complaint about Jerusalem. He ordered a search and found that the city had a history of rebelling against kings. The message is about the historical rebellious nature of Jerusalem.

Giải thích cho trẻ em

Imagine you have a naughty friend who always breaks the rules. One day, you check their history and find out they've been naughty for a long time. That's like what this king did with Jerusalem - he found out it was a troublemaker.

Bối cảnh lịch sử

Ezra 4:19 is part of the book of Ezra, written by the priest Ezra, around 450 BC. The book was written for the returning exiles to Jerusalem, detailing their struggles with local adversaries and the rebuilding of the temple.

Áp dụng cho hôm nay

Consider a scenario where a company is hesitant to hire someone because of their past behavior. The verse reminds us to consider historical contexts when making decisions, similar to how the king evaluated Jerusalem's history before taking action.

Chủ đề

• rebellion
• leadership
• history
• authority
• resistance
• judgment

Các câu liên quan

• 1 Samuel 8:7
• Nehemiah 4:10
• Acts 4:25
• Revelation 11:8
• 1 Samuel 15:23

Câu hỏi thường gặp

Who is speaking in Ezra 4:19?

The speaker is Artaxerxes, the Persian king, who is responding to a complaint about Jerusalem.

What does the verse tell us about Jerusalem's past?

The verse indicates that Jerusalem had a history of insurrection and rebellion against kings, showing it was often trouble for ruling authorities.

How does this verse apply to modern leadership?

Modern leaders can learn from this verse about the importance of understanding a community's history before making decisions, to avoid repeating past mistakes.

What does this verse say about authority?

It reflects the perspective of authority figures who may judge based on historical behavior, suggesting a cautious approach when dealing with rebellious entities.