Deuteronomy 22:5

Dutch 1939 (De Heilige Schrift, Petrus Canisiusvertaling, 1939)

Een vrouw mag geen mannenkleren dragen, en een man niet het kleed van een vrouw; want wie zo iets doet, is een afschuw voor Jahweh.

Wat betekent dit?

This verse from Deuteronomy says that women should not wear men's clothes and men should not wear women's clothes. God considers such behavior an abomination. Moses is speaking, giving laws to the Israelites.

Uitgelegd voor kinderen

Imagine if boys wore dresses to school and girls wore tuxedos. It would be confusing and not what we're used to. This verse tells us to stick to the clothes that fit our gender, just like how we dress for different occasions, like wearing costumes for Halloween.

Historische achtergrond

Moses wrote this verse around 1400-1200 BCE as part of the laws for the Israelites. It was meant for a society where gender roles and distinctions were very clear and strictly adhered to.

Toepassing voor vandaag

In modern times, this verse can remind us to avoid confusing and misleading others with our appearance. For example, a person who presents themselves in a way that contradicts their identity could cause confusion or discomfort in their community.

Onderwerpen

• gender roles
• laws
• identity
• appearance
• respect
• community standards

Gerelateerde verzen

• Deuteronomy 27:15
• Isaiah 3:18-24
• 1 Corinthians 11:2-16
• 1 Timothy 2:9-10
• 1 Peter 3:3-4

Aanbevolen literatuur

Commentaar Commentaren op Deuteronomy → Deze Bijbel Studiebijbel (De Heilige Schrift, Petrus Canisiusvertaling, ) →

Veelgestelde vragen

Why is this verse important?

This verse is part of the larger set of laws given by God to guide the Israelites in living a righteous life. It emphasizes the importance of order and clarity in roles and identities.

Does this apply to all cultures?

This verse was originally meant for the Israelites, but it can be interpreted to guide people in maintaining clear and respectful roles and identities in any culture.

What about gender identity?

This verse was written in a context where gender roles were very clear-cut. Modern interpretations often consider the broader principle of respecting identity and avoiding confusion.

Are there exceptions to this rule?

The primary intent of this rule is to avoid confusion and maintain order. Specific exceptions might be considered in contexts where cultural or practical reasons necessitate different clothing choices.