Acts 23:29

Thia KJV (พระคัมภีร์ภาษาไทยฉบับ KJV)

ข้าพเจ้าเห็นว่าเขาถูกฟ้องในเรื่องอันเกี่ยวกับกฎหมายของพวกยิว แต่ไม่มีข้อหาที่เขาควรจะตายหรือควรจะต้องจำไว้

ข้อนี้หมายความว่าอะไร?

This verse is spoken by a Roman commander named Claudius Lysias, who says that Paul was accused of issues related to Jewish law but did not commit any crime deserving death or imprisonment.

อธิบายสำหรับเด็ก

Imagine you're playing a game and someone accuses you of cheating. But when the teacher checks, they see you didn't break any real rules. That's what happened here with Paul. He was in trouble for some religious stuff, but he didn't do anything really bad like stealing or hurting others.

บริบททางประวัติศาสตร์

This verse is from the Book of Acts, written by Luke around AD 60-80, aimed at a primarily Gentile audience to explain the early church and its spread. The context involves Paul defending himself against Jewish accusations before a Roman court.

การประยุกต์ใช้วันนี้

In today's world, this reminds us that we should be careful not to overreact or unfairly accuse others of serious wrongdoing without proper evidence. It’s important to seek truth and justice in our judgments.

หัวข้อ

• justice
• law
• defense
• accusation
• innocence
• truth

ข้อพระคัมภีร์ที่เกี่ยวข้อง

• John 8:2-11
• Romans 3:20
• Matthew 5:40-42
• Numbers 35:30
• 1 Timothy 6:10

คำถามที่พบบ่อย

Who is speaking in Acts 23:29?

Claudius Lysias, a Roman commander, is speaking. He provides his assessment of Paul's case.

What does 'questions of their law' refer to?

'Questions of their law' refers to the religious disputes within Jewish law that were at the center of the accusations against Paul.

Why is this verse important for understanding Paul's situation?

This verse is critical because it shows that from a Roman legal perspective, Paul did not commit any serious crimes, highlighting the religious nature of his troubles.

How does Acts 23:29 relate to issues of justice today?

Acts 23:29 reminds us about the importance of fair trials and not overcharging individuals. It stresses the need for careful examination of evidence before judgment.