John 7:51

Chinese (Simplified) Contemporary Bible (CCB Bible) (圣经当代译本修订版)

“难道不先听被告申辩并查明真相，我们的律法就定他的罪吗？”

这是什么意思？

This verse from John 7:51 is spoken by a Pharisee named Nicodemus, who argues that their law does not judge anyone without first hearing them and understanding what they have done. The key message is about fairness in judgment.

儿童解释

Imagine if your teacher gave you a punishment before listening to why you were late for class. This verse tells us it's important to listen and understand someone before we decide anything bad about them, just like how you'd want your teacher to hear your side of the story first.

历史背景

John, one of Jesus' disciples, wrote this Gospel around 90 AD for a mixed Jewish and Gentile audience. The cultural setting was one where Jewish legal traditions played a crucial role in daily life and community decisions.

今日应用

In today’s world, consider a situation at work or school where someone accuses you of something without knowing the full story. This verse reminds us to seek understanding before we judge others, ensuring fairness and justice are served.

主题

• justice
• judgment
• fairness
• listening
• legal practices
• understanding

相关经文

• Exodus 23:1
• Matthew 7:1-2
• John 8:46
• Luke 6:37
• Romans 14:4

常见问题

Who is Nicodemus in this verse?

Nicodemus was a Pharisee, a member of the Jewish ruling council. He came to Jesus at night to discuss spiritual matters and later defended him before other leaders.

Why does John include this dialogue involving Nicodemus?

John includes this dialogue to highlight themes of fairness and justice in judgment, showing that even some religious authorities recognized the importance of a fair trial.

How can we apply the principle of listening before judging in our daily lives?

By taking time to understand someone's actions or words fully before forming an opinion or passing judgment. This helps prevent misunderstandings and promotes peace.

What does this verse teach about legal practices in Jesus' time?

This verse shows that even then, it was considered unjust to judge without hearing the accused first. It reflects a value of fair treatment under law.