Matthew 21:32

Chinese Simplified CUNPSS Script Union (新标点和合本, 神版)

因为 约翰 遵着义路到你们这里来，你们却不信他；税吏和娼妓倒信他。你们看见了，后来还是不懊悔去信他。」

这是什么意思？

Jesus is speaking here and points out that John the Baptist came to teach people about righteousness, but the religious leaders did not believe him. However, even those who were sinners like tax collectors and prostitutes believed John's message. The religious leaders did not change their minds even after seeing this.

儿童解释

Imagine if a teacher tried to explain how to be nice and kind, but only the kids who usually don't listen paid attention and learned. Then the good students didn’t want to listen or learn from what they saw the others doing right.

历史背景

Matthew wrote this account of Jesus' teachings around AD 80-90 for a Jewish-Christian audience. The setting is significant as it reflects tensions between religious leaders and Jesus, who challenged their interpretations of faith.

今日应用

A modern scenario could involve someone from a respected community ignoring advice from an outsider on important matters but then being surprised when people often seen as less reliable take that advice seriously, leading to personal growth or change.

主题

• faith
• repentance
• righteousness
• leadership
• judgment
• forgiveness

相关经文

• Luke 7:29-30
• Mark 1:4-6
• John 1:15-17
• Isaiah 40:3-5
• Matthew 3:1-12

常见问题

What is the main message of Matthew 21:32?

The main message is about recognizing righteousness and being open to change, even if it comes from an unexpected source.

Who were publicans and harlots in Jesus' time?

Publicans were tax collectors often seen as traitors for working with the Romans, while harlots referred to prostitutes. Both groups were marginalized by society.

How does this verse apply to modern religious settings?

It suggests that those who are perceived as less righteous might sometimes have important truths to share, challenging our preconceived notions about faith and righteousness.

Why did the religious leaders not believe John?

They may have seen him as a threat or someone lacking authority due to his lifestyle, highlighting their inability to accept new ideas that challenged their status quo.